Null

During one of my trades recently with a reader in France, he sent me an unbanded cigar and asked me to review it blind, to see what I thought of it. It was a huge cigar, 8 3/4 inches, to be exact.

I was shocked to find out that it was a very interesting cigar, one called Navarre that uses 100 percent French tobacco. The tobacco plantation is situated in a town called Navarrenx in the region of the Béarn in southern France. This is also where the Tobacco Institute of Bergeran, which is the only European research center that is completely devoted to various uses of the tobacco plant) was founded in 1927.

Null

Navarre Double Corona 1.png

(map courtsy of Google, of course)

Navarre Double Corona 2.png

(photo of the town of Navarrenx courtesy www.survoldefrance.fr)

The tobacco is grown using Cuban seeds, and the cigars are rolled by French rollers who were taught by their counterparts from Cuba…In fact, one of the owners of the brand, Noel Labourdette, “poached” two women rollers — named Greta and Maury — from a Havana factory.

Navarre Double Corona 3.png

(photo of Navarre Cigars courtesy daylife.com)

In 2005, Labourdettehad this to say about starting the brand:

“When I saw Frenchmen were producing caviar, a lightbulb went on upstairs — if they can do that, I can do cigars”…

Navarre Double Corona 4.png

  • Cigar Reviewed: Navarre Double Corona
  • Country of Origin: France
  • Factory: Navarre
  • Wrapper: France
  • Binder: France
  • Filler: France
  • Size: 8 1/2 Inches
  • Ring Gauge: 48
  • Vitola: Double Corona
  • Est. Price: $25.00
  • Date of Cigar: Unknown

When I said this cigar was huge, I was not kidding. I could hold it in both hands easily, and still have room left over. In fact, to give you an idea of it’s size, here is a photo of it next to a Por Larrañaga Los Andes:

Navarre Double Corona 5.png

The cigar has a cinnamon brown wrapper and has many obvious veins running down the length of it. In fact, I have seen few cigars that have such prominent veins. The wrapper is fairly leathery, but smooth, and smells of barnyard and hay. The first time I smelled it, I immediately thought “dry cow patties,” but I think barnyard is a more accurate description. It also has a great triple cap.

The cigar lights easily and I tasted a bit of spice up front, along with a sweet leather and hay. I was expecting some cedar, but did not taste any at all. The spice was a constant background note throughout the first third. I also had to touch it up many times during the first third.

Navarre Double Corona 6.png

The second third started with the spice picking up a bit, lots of leather, although not as sweet, and another flavor that stumped me at first, but I finally identified as a potato: starchy and dry. A very interesting note that stayed around a while, but when it was gone, it did not come back. The burn was not as bad as the first third, but still sub-par.

Navarre Double Corona 7.png

During the last third, the potato flavor disappeared, but the spice level remained about the same. The leather note came back with a vengeance, and underneath was flavors of nuts and wood, but not cedar. It got hot at the end, which did not surprise me, but I was able to get it close to the nub before tossing it.

Navarre Double Corona 8.png

Final Notes:

  • I was expecting this cigar to take a while to finish, but I was not expecting a three-hour smoke. The final smoking time was two hours and 50 minutes. Honestly, it was just too long of a cigar and I would never in my life choose something this big to smoke on my own. At the beginning, I felt like I was smoking a long thin pipe.
  • When I got the Navarre in the mail, it was in a glass tube with a cork stopper…The first time I took it out of the tube, it was so spongy, I could literally squeeze the cigar all the way down until my fingers met: way too wet. So, before the review, I dryboxed it for about two weeks, it was still spongy, but not near as bad as it was before.
  • The burn problems on this cigar were abysmal. Even after dryboxing it for two weeks, it was still too wet, and that is most likely what contributed to the problems. I would not be surprised if it was just a characteristic of the tobacco.
80 Overall Score

This was an interesting cigar for being what it was, but in terms of taste and flavors, it was just an average-good cigar. Since I smoked it blind, I felt it was Cuban tobacco of some sort, as it had quite a few of the same characteristics, albeit with a few notes that I had not tasted in Cubans before, and now I know why. The burn was, frankly, horrible, and while it did not seem to affect the flavor of the cigar, it was not a fun time fixing it for three hours.

Null

Brooks Whittington

I have been smoking cigars for over eight years. A documentary wedding photographer by trade, I spent seven years as a photojournalist for the Dallas Morning News and the Fort Worth Star Telegram. I started the cigar blog SmokingStogie in 2008 after realizing that there was a need for a cigar blog with better photographs and more in-depth information about each release. SmokingStogie quickly became one of the more influential cigar blogs on the internet, known for reviewing preproduction, prerelease, rare, extremely hard-to-find and expensive cigars. I am a co-founder of halfwheel and now serve as an editor for halfwheel.