Review: Macanudo Café Portofino


Say what? Macanudo makes a Lancero? And it comes in a tube? Well… sort of. It’s not a true El Laguito No. 1, it’s actually 7 x 34, a hair thicker than the Ninfas (7 x 33), a Slim Panatela. It’s also not a cigar that you’d really expect to be on most cigar blogs, because let’s face it… Macanudos aren’t what the typical cigar reviewer smokes. However, for the average American, Macanudo is one of the most known names of the cigar industry, hence why it’s America’s most popular selling cigar, year in and year out.

Macanudo Portofino 1.JPG

  • Name: Macanudo Café Portofino
  • Vitola: Slim Panatela
  • Size: 7 x 34
  • Wrapper: Connecticut Shade
  • Binder: Mexican San Andreas
  • Filler: Dominican Piloto Cubano & Mexican
  • Country: Dominican Republic
  • Factory: General Cigar Dominicana
  • MSRP: $6.50 (Boxes of 25, $162.50)
  • Source: Cigar Warehouse ($7)
  • Time in Humidor: 1 Months
  • Cut: Xikar Xi3 Light: Colibri Boss II
  • Beverage: Coke
  • Smoking Time: 1 Hour 30 Minutes
Macanudo Portofino 2.JPG

Today’s Smoke
There’s not really a whole lot of info about these online, but I felt it necessary to get a wide spectrum of “Lancero” reviews, i.e., reviews from cigars that just aren’t made by Pepín. Neither Altadis U.S.A., nor General Cigar Co. (the maker of Macanudo), are quite fond of the whole Lancero thing, particularly General. Outside of CAO, which became part of General because of a merger between the two parent companies, the closest General has to a true El Laguito No. 1 is a 7 x 37 La Gloria Cubana; a fairly astounding fact considering the hundreds of cigars General makes. Anyways, the 7 x 34 format is available in two different Macanudo blends, the Café and the Robust. Prior to smoking a few of these, I can’t say I was that familiar with the Macanudo brand. To my knowledge, I had smoked two Macanudos and a Cru Royale, the latter dubbed as a much different Macanudo.

After removing the cigar and cedar from the tube, things become a bit apparent. The light cappuccino colored wrapper has got a fairly average amount of veins, but it’s a rather rough roll. It’s not your typical (or what I remember as a typical Macanudo), it’s got sweet nuts and hints of cedar; mild, but noticeably lack the Macanudo smell I remember. While the cigar is soft to the touch, it is packed incredibly tight, concerning to extension.

Macanudo Portofino 3.JPG

Lighting
Clipping it doesn’t alleviate any concerns as the top is rolled even tighter than the foot. Aroma from the top is cedar with a noticeable amounts of fruit, although still mild. It’s pretty clear the cigar is plugged from the initial cold draw, flavor is fruits with some tobacco. Even so, I try to light the Macanudo Portofino, it starts Cuban, real Cuban. All three Portofinos I smoked had a wonderful fruit note that develops slowly into a deep nuts leading to high salivation. And oh yeah… they are plugged, bad.

Macanudo Portofino 4.JPG

First Third
I’ll be quite honest, you can go ahead and skip to the last two paragraphs… but if you would like to know… Flavor is respectable, fruits with a touch of cedar, sweetness and hay; mild, but still somewhat complex with the richness. Finish is much of the same, an added hay note, mild with some length. The white ash holds on for about an inch and a half. And then there is the construction… It’s already awful, draw is terrible. On all three Portofinos the draw tool was a necessity and it was a single poke, multiple holes still seemed to have no effect on the draw, to be continued…

Macanudo Portofino 5.JPG

Second Third
By the middle portion, it’s classic Macanudo. That smooth tobacco flavor is overriding some cedar notes, but I think we all know what’s going on here. Finish goes from smooth tobacco to a bit of nuttiness. The real story is the stem removal process that begins. As you can see below, I pulled out quite a few stems (all those were from one cigar, and there were more still left), and every cigar had more than one that were fairly large. It’s pretty impressive for two reasons: A. you can get that many stems in a 34, B. the cigar never went out, despite me not puffing on it for minutes. Strength is where one would believe it to be mild, no change from the first third.

Macanudo Portofino 6.JPG

Final Third
By this point I’ve removed six stems from the Portofino. There are two more that I can see and presumably a few more inside the cigar. The cigar is mushy thanks to my surgery and it’s really a pain to smoke, although it’s still burning, albeit with an obviously open draw. Flavor is still very much Macanudo, a bit more earth than I would have expected, it’s medium with a fairly generic tobacco and cedar finish. Eventually I give up and dissect the cigar. Just as I had suspected, the binder actually has a stem attached to it (one of the reasons I couldn’t remove it), the stem portion pictured in the far right. I count three other stems in the final inch and a half of the cigar, not really shocking. This was by far the worst example that I had, but all the Portofinos I’ve smoked have had a lot of stems.

Macanudo Portofino 7.JPG

For the Novice
Is this too strong? Absolutely not. Is this readily available? Yes. Would I recommend this? Absolutely not. Is it because it’s a Macanudo? No. Is it because of how it tastes? No. Look above, I think it’s fairly straight forward.

Macanudo Portofino 8.JPG

In the End
There were some shocking attributes, most notably how the cigars continued to burn at a near identical pace, even with the massive stem removal. Stems aside, it seems like someone rolled what should be a 38 RG and put it in a 34 RG mold. While I didn’t full out seven stems from each Portofino I smoked, the tight roll of all of them gives me a lot of other concern as far as construction goes.

 

48. Unsmokeable.

Lancero50/20

9 comments
Barry
Barry

Im curious as I subscribe to the belief that in every box there is one bad cigar. Draw issues, construction issues, etc. After all it is a man made product. Did you smoke a second one to see if it was a similar issue.

I'll admit from time to time when I want to smoke something incredibly mild I will reach for a portofino. I tend to smoke like 5-6 a year. From my experiences the draw has been too loose.

Charlie
Charlie

I used my fingernails, which usually works for me. Tweezers are definitely the best method, I'm just not OCD enough to carry them around with me while I smoke.

There's a large debate over whether pulling stems out is even a good idea, this was more out of shock.

LennyM
LennyM

Great review Charlie. Please tell me - how do you remove the stems from the cigar?? I've had this problem, but I have no idea how to get them out. Do you use tweezers or something?

Charlie
Charlie

Thanks for all the comments.

I should make it clear. The debate is still out in whether or not stems are good for taste, I know people like Pete Johnson claim that they are.

The problems with the stems is more a byproduct of some bad BUNCHING.

Stem in the binder? Not good. Stem poking out of through the binder visible on the wrapper? Not good. Both of them on the same cigar? Someone fell asleep at the rolling table.

The secondary issue, which perhaps is an even larger one, is this is a Macanudo. While there are definitely a lot of people that smoke Macanudos because they have for years, a lot of Macanudo smokers are new smokers or smokers who aren't experienced. Understanding the science behind plugged draws and how to correctly fix them is not something that is going to in the real of knowledge of a lot of smokers. In addition, the fact that this is a 34 amplifies the issue because the room for error for correcting it becomes a lot smaller compared to a bigger RG.

Charlie

Mark Miyahira
Mark Miyahira

Interesting review Charlie! Was looking at picking up a lancero for the shop that was on the light side. Currently carry the Illusione Candela hl (although I know your feelings on Candela), J Fuego Origin Lancero and thought that something in the Macanudo type of name that is on the lighter side would do well. Thanks for the heads up!

Ryan
Ryan

John, I'm glad they don't mention Viaje. I'm a Viaje-whore...it's easier for me to get my hands on the 50 box/bundle releases this way! Shhhh! haha.

John
John

And I know CA had Viaje in as their #2 cigar last yr. But its almost as if by accident. Then to never mention them again. Even in their twice monthly "Insider" that provides us with "up to date, breaking news, etc." C'mon.

John
John

CA, is so far behind in the times it's silly. Their cigar insider, out every 2 weeks, is yet to make mention of Viaje cigars. That and a couple of weeks ago, they reviewed Pepin's La Rebola,"Sumatra and Habano", calling the 2 blends new. But made no mention about the 3rd "new" blend. Mexico, which is the best of the 3, in my opinion. And let me add, I remember reading a Gordon Mott blog about a yr ago,where he said they only smoke 1" of a cigar for a review. I shit You Not, 1"!

dmjones1009
dmjones1009

Wow! Good on ya for taking "one for the team," Charlie. I don't remember the last time I've seen a rating this low on any blog (except my own which has rated a couple stogies really low). I guess for CA, this would be an 86? :)

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Lancero? Yes, well sort of… It’s known as the “Porto Real” and like the Macanudo Porto Fino, it comes in tubo. It’s one of the many Lanceros I never knew existed, but given [...]