In 2019, La Sirena celebrated its 10th anniversary with a cigar called the La Sirena Aniversario Especial. It was released in a single 5 3/4 x 54 robusto extra size and limited to just 1,000 cigars, though those wouldn’t be the two things I find most interesting about that cigar. First, it used a blend that included Mexican tobacco for the wrapper, binder and some of the filler; second, the cigar lacked La Sirena’s massive bands that I’ve come to associate with the brand since it launched in 2009.

La Sirena is Spanish for the mermaid and it’s a theme that Danny Ditkowich has used for most of the company’s cigars. Today’s review is of the relatively new La Sirena Mexican Mermaid, a regular production line that launched in late 2021 that is based on the La Sirena Aniversario Especial. While the La Sirena Mexican Mermaid still predominantly features Mexican tobacco, it is made in the Dominican Republic, as opposed to the La Sirena Aniversario Especial was made in Mexico.

As for why it’s called Mexican Mermaid, it’s likely due in part to using Mexican tobacco for the wrapper, binder and part of the filler. Of note, the blends are not identical on paper, as the Mexican Mermaid uses Dominican and Mexican tobaccos for the filler, while the Aniversario Especial had a quartet of countries represented that also included Brazil and Nicaragua.

The Mexican Mermaid is offered in four sizes:

  • La Sirena Mexican Mermaid 5 3/4 x 54 — September 2021
  • La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Robusto (5 x 50) — December 2021
  • La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Lancero (6 1/2 x 42) — December 2021
  • La Sirena Mexican Mermaid 6 x 60 — February 2022

  • Cigar Reviewed: La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Lancero
  • Country of Origin: Dominican Republic
  • Wrapper: Mexico
  • Binder: Mexico
  • Filler: Dominican Republic & Mexico
  • Length: 6 1/2 Inches
  • Ring Gauge: 42
  • Vitola: Cervantes
  • MSRP: $15 (Box of 20, $300)
  • Release Date: December 2021
  • Number of Cigars Released: Regular Production
  • Number of Cigars Smoked For Review: 3

When La Sirena debuted as company, I remember being surprised that it decided to create bands as large as it did for cigars. Nowadays, these bands are still large, but not as jarring as they once were, but because it’s not a full cylinder, these bands still look as unique as they did when I first saw them.While this might not be the best use of paper, they do serve a purpose. If you can’t remember the name “La Sirena” but are ever in a cigar shop trying to find a cigar, you can always just ask for “that one with the huge bands” and you’ll be likely to eventually get pointed in the right direction. As for this band, there are a number of nautical-themed details on it but my favorite parts are a bit more subtle: the pewter-colored logo and the contrasting red and green backgrounds behind the “S” characters on top and bottom. The other great part about this band is the white background, which contrasts well against the reddish-brown wrapper. While you can’t tell in the pictures, the cigar is extremely bumpy to the touch and quite firm when I squeeze it. Of the five cigars we purchased, two of them have caps that aren’t entirely flush, something that is obvious in the picture above. The aroma from the wrapper is medium-full with a crisp earthiness and something that reminds me of the scent of fire-cured tobacco. There’s some weird herbal flavor—at times it’s like a green licorice—along with a chocolate that comes across like spoiled chocolate milk. The cold draws are quite tight and, quite frankly, not the best tasting. There’s raisins, something akin to rotten melon, cocoa, acidity and some general foulness. It’s not rancid, but the foul flavor is off-putting enough that I’m not all that interested in trying to take much time figuring out what exactly it is.

Fortunately, the La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Lancero starts off a lot better than the cold draw. The draw’s tightness is better and the flavor is much improved. There’s lots of vibrant cedar, toastiness, some sweetness and a bit of a sharpness. To some degree, it reminds me of Liga Privada No. 9 from back in the day. While the comparisons to Liga Privada wear off after a few minutes, the vibrant cedar does not. It’s joined by some precise white pepper, a honey-like sweetness and some peanut-like nuttiness underneath. Cedar remains the leading flavor during the finish with earthiness, walnuts, creaminess and minor amounts of both bitterness and floral sweetness joining the mixture as well. Retrohales are led by a mixture of nuttiness over earthiness, leather and white pepper. Because of both a lack of creaminess and some touches of toastiness, retrohales seem to have a bit darker of a profile than the main flavor. The finish is a bit sweeter but nuttiness remains the leading flavor; at times, I find interesting accent flavors including brown mustard and sesame seeds. Flavor is full, body is medium and strength is medium. The draw is a bit tight, but outside of a slow burn, that doesn’t seem to be affecting the cigar. Smoke production is great and the burn is remarkably even.

Before the first third finishes, the giant main band needs to be removed, revealing the smaller secondary band that La Sirena includes. As for the performance of the cigar, the La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Lancero gets both earthier and saltier in the second third. Some of that is due to increased amounts of earthiness and saltiness, but I think some of it is caused by a reduction in creaminess. Beyond that, I taste a generic meatiness and touches of minerals. What’s surprising is how much of a backseat both the cedar and nutty flavors have taken, though both are still present as secondary, maybe even tertiary flavors. Once the smoke leaves my mouth, there’s a Nila wafer-like sweetness, white pepper, saltiness, dry creaminess and leather. Retrohales have a brighter red pepper flavor that sits atop some generic white bread and leather. After retrohaling, there’s a semi-sweet graham cracker-like flavor, black tea and some herbal sensations. Flavor is full, body is medium-full and strength is medium-plus. Construction remains fine during the second third, though there are some stretches where the smoke production wanes. Fortunately, increasing the puff rate temporarily fixes the issue each time and then I can settle back into a more comfortable rhythm.

After more than two-and-a-half hours of smoking per cigar, it’s easy to get lulled into what’s become a pretty generic earthy profile during the final third. Though it’s not all that simple, there are some puffs that deliver big doses of a very defined sesame seed flavor that remind me it’s been too long since I had a good bagel. Elsewhere, there’s toastiness, leather and white pepper. I struggle to find much of a difference between the main flavor and the finish: it’s pretty similar save for some added herbal and red pepper touches, though neither are all that strong in comparison to the earthiness or sesame seeds. Retrohales have a restrained red pepper flavor over earthiness and some herbal notes. While it’s an aggressive pepper, it’s not that dominant of a flavor in terms of how intense it is. The red pepper sticks around for a while, but like the main profile, I struggle to find much of a difference between the main flavor and the finish. Flavor is full, body is medium-full and strength is medium-full. One touch-up is needed at some point during the second half, mainly just to help with smoke production.

Final Notes

  • I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that this is closer to being a lonsdale than it is a lancero. In the Cuban system, the term lonsdale applies to a range of cigars that are least 160mm (6 3/10 inches) long and with a ring gauge between 40 and 44.
  • The traditional Cuban lancero size, known as the Laguito No.1  is 7 9/16 (192mm) x 38, and this is a bit more than an inch and four ring gauges off from that.
  • There is a size in the Cuban system called the Cervantes that is exactly the same size as this cigar, and that is classified as a lonsdale.
  • If I was to play vitola judge, I’d stop allowing things to be called lanceros if they were anything shorter than 7 inches or thicker than 40 ring gauge.
  • While it didn’t last for very long, the first few puffs remind me a lot of older Liga Privada No. 9s, particularly ones that were a year or two old. The combination of cedar, sweetness and pepper is something that seemed remarkably familiar.
  • Patrick noted in his review of the La Sirena Aniversario Especial that the cigar was rolled at Nueva Matacapan de Tabacos S.A. de C.V., which was at least the sixth different factory to make cigars for La Sirena. Given the close relationship between Danny Ditkowich, owner of La Sirena, and Hostos Fernández Quesada, owner of TABACALERA LA iSLA, it was of zero surprise to see La Sirena cigars being made at TABACALERA LA iSLA once that factory was up and running.
  • Brooks and I visited TABACALERA LA iSLA last month—though it feels like that was six months ago—and got to see some La Sirena cigars being banded. Needless to say, it did not look fun.
  • Part of that has to do with the second band that is underneath the main band. As is evidenced on the pictures above, quite a bit of residue was leftover from the main band. On each cigar I smoked, I couldn’t fully make out where the inner band said “La Sirena.”
  • I for one could do without the inside band. While it can stay on the cigar for longer than the first band, it too has to be removed by the halfway mark and seems like a waste of—a small amount of—paper given its limited usefulness.
  • I am rather surprised by the blend here. While I knew the cigar had a Mexican wrapper and there are certainly signs of it throughout the cigar, this doesn’t taste like a cigar that is made with this much Mexican tobacco. That said, like many countries, there’s not a singular flavor profile I associate with Mexican tobacco and it definitely can show itself in many different ways.
  • I’d be curious to know what this cigar would be like with a draw that was just slightly more open. Even for someone who likes a tight draw, this was a bit too tight and probably contributed to the need for a touch-up in the final third.
  • Cigars for this review were purchased by halfwheel.
  • Final smoking times took as long as three hours and 30 minutes. The sample with the best draw was closer to three hours, but it’s clear the tight draw was slowing down the smoking rate, particularly in the first half.
90 Overall Score

I recently reviewed the Chogüí Dos77 Corojo Rogusto and used this part of the review to ponder what my thoughts would be like if the cigar’s flavor progression was reversed in order. That cigar started off poor and finished a lot better. I want to be clear, the La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Lanceros' worst point was much better than the Chogüí’s first third, but I can’t help but think how much of a factor the ordering plays into my overall thoughts about the La Sirena Mexican Mermaid Lancero. The first third was excellent, the second third was good and the final third was fine but boring. However, because the best part was upfront, I didn’t have to wait—and in this case, that would have meant waiting more than two hours with my epically slow smoking pace—for the cigar to get good, and quite frankly, for the cigar to get great, as this is the best La Sirena I’ve smoked to date.

Avatar photo

Charlie Minato

I am an editor and co-founder of Media, LLC. I previously co-founded and published TheCigarFeed, one of the two predecessors of halfwheel. I have written about the cigar industry for more than a decade, covering everything from product launches to regulation to M&A. In addition, I handle a lot of the behind-the-scenes stuff here at halfwheel. I enjoy playing tennis, watching boxing, falling asleep to the Le Mans 24, wearing sweatshirts year-round and eating gyros. echte liebe.